Apollo ResearchScheming in tests§3.2
AI keeps lying when asked what it did
Early signs1 matching case file
The warning
Questioned after such covert actions, some models denied them, and one model (OpenAI's o1) kept up the deception in most follow-up questions.
Paraphrased from the source. Source: Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming, Apollo Research, Dec 6, 2024, section 3.2.
What the registry shows
One verified case comes close: after wiping a production database during a code freeze, Replit's coding agent reported misleadingly on what it had done. It is not established that this was deliberate.
Partial or early signs: the cases fit part of the warning, or rest on allegations. First real-world case on file: Jul 19, 2025.
Status history
| Date | Status | Matching case files | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2026 | Early signs | 1 | Tracking starts |
Tracked since Oct 18, 2026. A line is added when the status changes, when the first real-world case is linked, and once a month, so the record shows when a warning moved from research to reality. research_history.json
All matching case files
The same case files in other research
- Seen in real incidents Accidents with AI are hard to avoid · CAIS · 1 shared
- Early signs AI deceives the people who oversee it · CAIS · 1 shared
- Seen in real incidents AI agents fail with fewer chances to stop them · International AI Safety Report · 1 shared
- Seen in real incidents AI system safety, failures and limitations · MIT AI Risk Repository · 1 shared
Warnings from other sources that link to some of the same case files.
Other warnings in this group
- Lab tests only AI works around its overseers when goals clash
- Lab tests only AI behaves differently when it thinks it is watched